Clinical factors associated with systemic sporotrichosis in Brazil.

BACKGROUND: Systemic sporotrichosis occurs when organs, other than subcutaneous tissues and lymph nodes, are infected. Interestingly, systemic sporotrichosis in apparently immunocompetent individuals is increasing in Brazil, but data on clinical manifestations and risk factors are scarce. Most of the existing data on such condition relate to people living with HIV. We aimed to study the risk factors associated with systemic sporotrichosis among HIV-negative and HIV-positive patients. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cross-sectional study with 80 patients from Brazil, diagnosed between 2014 and 2021. The association between disease classification, clinical presentation and risk factors were analysed by logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the 80 patients, 29 (36.3%) presented with systemic sporotrichosis. All HIV-positive patients developed the systemic form, with increased mortality (p = .002). Alcohol ingestion (p = .009) and diabetes (p = .010) were associated with systemic disease. Alcohol ingestion seemed to favour pulmonary infection (p = .013) and, diabetes favoured osteoarticular (p = .009) and ocular involvement (p = .033). The occurrence of fever (p = .001) and weight loss (p = .006) were significantly associated with systemic sporotrichosis, while meningeal involvement (p = .001) increased mortality risk. Nine (11.3%) patients died from sporotrichosis. The presence of fungal structures in the mycological examination of the patients' lesions were associated with the systemic form (p = .017) and death (p = .002). CONCLUSION: Our study points to the factors that drive systemic sporotrichosis other than HIV, such as alcohol ingestion and diabetes. Considering the high number of patients presenting severe sporotrichosis, the recognising these factors may contribute to timely diagnosis and proper treatment.

COVID-19 and candiduria: an investigation of the risk factors and immunological aspects.

Secondary fungal infections are frequently observed in COVID-19 patients. However, the occurrence of candiduria in these patients and its risk factors are underexplored. We evaluated the risk factors of candiduria in COVID-19 patients, including inflammatory mediators that could be used as prognostic markers. Clinical information, laboratory test results, and outcomes were collected from severely ill COVID-19 patients with and without candiduria. Candida species identification, antifungal susceptibility, and plasma inflammatory mediators' measurements were performed. Regression logistic and Cox regression model were used to evaluate the risk factors. A higher risk of longer hospitalization and mortality were observed in patients with candiduria compared to those with COVID-19 only. Candiduria was caused by Candida albicans, C. glabrata, and C. tropicalis. Isolates with intermediate susceptibility to voriconazole and resistant to caspofungin were identified. Classic factors such as the use of corticosteroids and antibacterials, the worsening of renal function, and hematological parameters (hemoglobin and platelets) were found to predispose to candiduria. The mediators IL-1ß, IL-1ra, IL-2, CXCL-8, IL-17, IFN-γ, basic FGF, and MIP-1ß were significantly increased in patients with COVID-19 and candiduria. Furthermore, IFN-γ, IL-1ra, and CXCL-8 were associated with the occurrence of candiduria in COVID-19 patients, whereas basic FGF, IL-1ß, and CXCL-8 were associated with the risk of death in these patients. Classical and immunological factors were associated with worse prognosis among patients with COVID-19 and candiduria. Some mediators, especially CXCL-8, can be a reliable biomarker of fungal coinfection and may guide the diagnostic and the treatment of these patients.

The impact of COVID-19 on antimicrobial prescription and drug resistance in fungi and bacteria.

Secondary infections are one of the complications in COVID-19 patients. We aimed to analyze the antimicrobial prescriptions and their influence on drug resistance in fungi and bacteria isolated from severely ill COVID-19 patients. Seventy-nine severely ill COVID-19 hospitalized patients with secondary bacterial or fungal infections were included. We analyzed the prescribed antimicrobial regimen for these patients and the resistance profiles of bacterial and fungal isolates. In addition, the association between drug resistance and patients' outcome was analyzed using correlation tests. The most prescribed antibacterial were ceftriaxone (90.7% of patients), vancomycin (86.0%), polymyxin B (74.4%), azithromycin (69.8%), and meropenem (67.4%). Micafungin and fluconazole were used by 22.2 and 11.1% of patients, respectively. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) infections were a common complication in severely ill COVID-19 patients in our cohort since resistant bacteria strains were isolated from 76.7% of the patients. Oxacillin resistance was observed in most Gram-positive bacteria, whereas carbapenem and cephalosporin resistance was detected in most Gram-negative strains. Azole resistance was identified among C. glabrata and C. tropicalis isolates. Patients who used more antimicrobials stayed hospitalized longer than the others. The patient's age and the number of antibacterial agents used were associated with the resistance phenotype. The susceptibility profile of isolates obtained from severely ill COVID-19 patients highlighted the importance of taking microbial resistance into account when managing these patients. The continuous surveillance of resistant/MDR infection and the rational use of antimicrobials are of utmost importance, especially for long-term hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

Chagas disease and SARS-CoV-2 coinfection does not lead to worse in-hospital outcomes.

Chagas disease (CD) continues to be a major public health burden in Latina America. Information on the interplay between COVID-19 and CD is lacking. Our aim was to assess clinical characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of patients with CD and COVID-19, and to compare it to non-CD patients. Consecutive patients with confirmed COVID-19 were included from March to September 2020. Genetic matching for sex, age, hypertension, diabetes mellitus and hospital was performed in a 4:1 ratio. Of the 7018 patients who had confirmed COVID-19, 31 patients with CD and 124 matched controls were included (median age 72 (64-80) years-old, 44.5% were male). At baseline, heart failure (25.8% vs. 9.7%) and atrial fibrillation (29.0% vs. 5.6%) were more frequent in CD patients than in the controls (p < 0.05). C-reactive protein levels were lower in CD patients compared with the controls (55.5 [35.7, 85.0] vs. 94.3 [50.7, 167.5] mg/dL). In-hospital management, outcomes and complications were similar between the groups. In this large Brazilian COVID-19 Registry, CD patients had a higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation and chronic heart failure compared with non-CD controls, with no differences in-hospital outcomes. The lower C-reactive protein levels in CD patients require further investigation.

ABC2-SPH risk score for in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients: development, external validation and comparison with other available scores.

OBJECTIVES: The majority of available scores to assess mortality risk of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients in the emergency department have high risk of bias. Therefore, this cohort aimed to develop and validate a score at hospital admission for predicting in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients and to compare this score with other existing ones. METHODS: Consecutive patients (≥ 18 years) with confirmed COVID-19 admitted to the participating hospitals were included. Logistic regression analysis was performed to develop a prediction model for in-hospital mortality, based on the 3978 patients admitted between March-July, 2020. The model was validated in the 1054 patients admitted during August-September, as well as in an external cohort of 474 Spanish patients. RESULTS: Median (25-75th percentile) age of the model-derivation cohort was 60 (48-72) years, and in-hospital mortality was 20.3%. The validation cohorts had similar age distribution and in-hospital mortality. Seven significant variables were included in the risk score: age, blood urea nitrogen, number of comorbidities, C-reactive protein, SpO2/FiO2 ratio, platelet count, and heart rate. The model had high discriminatory value (AUROC 0.844, 95% CI 0.829-0.859), which was confirmed in the Brazilian (0.859 [95% CI 0.833-0.885]) and Spanish (0.894 [95% CI 0.870-0.919]) validation cohorts, and displayed better discrimination ability than other existing scores. It is implemented in a freely available online risk calculator (https://abc2sph.com/). CONCLUSIONS: An easy-to-use rapid scoring system based on characteristics of COVID-19 patients commonly available at hospital presentation was designed and validated for early stratification of in-hospital mortality risk of patients with COVID-19.

The Cure Rate after Placebo or No Therapy in American Cutaneous Leishmaniasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: There are few drugs with proven efficacy in cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL), and pentavalent antimonial derivatives are still the main first-line therapeutic agents worldwide, despite their recognized high toxicities. Randomized controlled clinical trials assessing the efficacy and safety of new therapeutic modalities are of high priority, and the definition of the design of such trials raises debate about the use of placebo as a comparator. To support the use of placebo as a comparator, two main points need to be addressed: 1--the cure rate without any therapeutic intervention and 2--the damage caused by CL and its impact on patients. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to systematically assess the spontaneous cure rate for American CL and to broaden the discussion about placebo use in CL trials. METHODS: The PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews and the Cochrane manual were followed. The sources used were the PubMed and LILACS databases. Studies were included if they reported cure rates using placebo or no treatment in American CL. RESULTS: Thirteen studies of a total of 352 patients were ultimately included in this review. The summarized global cure rates for all Leishmania species according to the intention-to-treat analyses performed at approximately three ("initial cure") and nine ("definitive cure") months after "no treatment" or placebo use were 26% (CI95%: 16 to 40%) and 26% (CI95%:16 to 38%), respectively. Notably, a significantly lower cure rate was observed for L. braziliensis infection (6.4%, CI95%:0.2 to 20%) than for L. mexicana infection (44%, CI95%:19 to 72%), p = 0.002. Of note, relapse occurred in 20% of patients with initial healing (CI95%:9.2 to 38.9%). CONCLUSION: These results clearly demonstrate a low spontaneous cure rate following no-treatment or placebo use, confirming that this strategy for the control group in CL studies expose patients to greater morbidity, especially for CL caused by L. braziliensis. Therefore, from this point, the crucial question to consider regarding placebo use is the seriousness of the suffering caused by this disease.

Efficacy of anti-leishmania therapy in visceral leishmaniasis among HIV infected patients: a systematic review with indirect comparison.

OBJECTIVE: We conducted a systematic literature review with indirect comparison of studies evaluating therapeutic efficacy and toxicity associated to visceral leishmaniasis (VL) therapy among HIV infected individuals. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The outcomes of interest were clinical and parasitological cure, mortality, and adverse events. METHODS: PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews and Cochrane manual were followed. Sources were MEDLINE, LILACS, EMBASE, Web of Knowledge databases and manual search of references from evaluated studies. We included all studies reporting outcomes after VL treatment, regardless of their design. Study quality was evaluated systematically by using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software v.2.2.048 was used to perform one-group meta-analysis of study arms with the same drug to estimate global rates of success and adverse events with each drug. These estimates were used, when possible, to indirectly compare treatment options, adjusted for CD4 count. Direct comparison was pooled when available. RESULTS: Seventeen studies reporting five treatment regimens and outcome of 920 VL episodes occurring in HIV infected individuals were included. The main outstanding difference in outcome among the treatment regimens was observed in mortality rate: it was around 3 times higher with high-dose antimony use (18.4%, CI 95% 13.3-25%), indirectly compared to lipid formulations of amphotericin B treatment (6.1%, CI 95% 3.9-9.4%). It was observed, also by indirect comparison, higher rates of clinical improvement in study arms using amphotericin B than in study arms using pentavalent antimonial therapy (Sb(v)). The parasitological cure, an outcome that presented some degree of risk of selection and verification bias, had rates that varied widely within the same treatment arm, with high heterogeneity, hampering any formal comparison among drugs. One direct comparison of amphotericin and antimoniate was possible combining results of two studies and confirming the superiority of amphotericin. CONCLUSIONS: Available evidence suggests that amphotericin is superior to antimony treatment. Death rate using antimoniate high dose is unacceptably high. Randomized controlled trials are necessary to compare different formulations and doses of amphotericin, alternative therapies and drug combinations.